Talk:Gender role in language

This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
Cleanup : edit to see
Collaborate : see /Collaboration
Copyedit : edit to see
Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender
Expand : edit to see
Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes
Merge : edit to see
Notability : edit to see
NPOV : edit to see
Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia
Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies
Split : History of feminism
Stubs : see Gender studies stubs
Translate : see /translation
Update : edit to see
Verify : Riot grrrl
Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention

Linguistics

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

use of "rôle"

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I understand that this spelling of "role" is still considered acceptable usage, but it seems like an unnecessary and distracting archaism in this article. As Wikipedia is written for a general audience, and especially as this article concerns a rather technical topic (readers may be confused and assume it's some linguistics term) it would make sense to move it. --129.11.12.201 (talk) 20:31, 17 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Badly written

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article is very badly written. It consists only of terribly organized quotations, organized in such a way that it looks like word salad. I can't even tell what is being said! 76.18.160.47 (talk) 22:20, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic