Talk:Gas explosion

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Criteria for the list

edit

I think the list is getting a bit out of control. It lists a lot of incidents, mostly in the USA, which are newsworthy but not very notable. They are all unreferenced.

I would like to propose that no explosion should be listed here unless it is already covered and referenced in another article. It would not have to be an article purely about the explosion. If it has an on-topic and referenced paragraph in another article then that is OK.

Is this agreeable? --DanielRigal (talk) 00:28, 2 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sorting the list

edit

From what I can tell the list appears to be sorted by date. Can anyone confirm that? Also, I was wondering if organizing this data into a table might make the page a bit easier to read? This would allow the data to be sorted by date, country, type of gas, etc. Just a thought. Mburdis (talk) 01:56, 9 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gas explosion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:53, 11 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Is the 2000's Section Becoming Super-saturated with Trivial Incidents?

edit

This article started out with examples of major gas explosions that add significant information to the topic (the dangers of flammable gases). In the 2000's section that changed recently. Now, it seems, every news article that people come across that involves gas explosions are added. In the first two sections there are few incidents included. The list is growing, most of the new reports, while trivially true, don't add much to the topic. It's likely there is a small gas explosion somewhere in the world every day. It's not necessary to include them in this Wiki.

And, yes, I understand that for those people involved in the "small, trivial" incidents they are neither small nor trivial. I'm speaking only to the academic value of those incidents relative to this article.22:50, 12 April 2020 (UTC)SanaroG (talk)