Talk:Garlic production in China

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Figures--Hunh??

edit

The article claims, in the Production section, that China produced 59 million tons of garlic in 2012. The table immediately following that paragraph gives a production figure of some 13 million tons in 2010. Did production increase by 40+ million tons in 2 years? That's pretty hard to believe. Is there some Soviet-style statistical manipulation going on? --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 16:57, 25 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Why is this article tagged as Top importance in Economics?

edit

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dryfee (talkcontribs) 05:13, February 28, 2014

I'll be bold and regrade it as low for all projects. Rincewind42 (talk) 17:46, 28 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Garlic production in China. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:25, 11 October 2017 (UTC)Reply