The only way this article could be more of a rip off of the Encyclopedia Britannic article is if it used the exact same words. As it is, it uses the format, organization and sentences of the original changing only words here and there. This is what happens when anonymous internet "ediotors" armed with cut-and-paste ability are given the ability to "create" without any editorial supervision. And while editors spend counltess hours combing articles for compliance with "WIKI Policies" no one is tasked with checking the acturacy, sourcing or adequacy of any article. AnthroMimus (talk) 23:20, 4 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
.svg){kind=small}
