Talk:Froot (song)
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Dekimasu in topic Requested move 13 October 2014
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Froot (song) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Requested move 13 October 2014
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: move the disambiguation page to the plain title and the album to Froot (album), per lack of indication of a primary topic and per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 22:27, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Froot (song) → Froot – This article was located at the plain title earlier this week, although an article had been (prematurely) created for the parent record by the same name. Since the album article has been redirected, the plain title should be restored for the title track. --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 03:13, 21 October 2014 (UTC) – WikiRedactor (talk) 13:33, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:27, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- Froot (song) is about a song, Froot is about a music album. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:27, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose a Youtube song off an upcoming Youtube album isn't primary anything. If anything the finance academic is what hits in Google Books. Move Froot (disambiguation) over the base space, and the (album) to Froot (album). In ictu oculi (talk) 03:19, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- @In ictu oculi: My point is that the album article shouldn't even exist right now; it is only five sentences long (at most) and there is absolutely no information available about it aside from this song being on it. It's not a matter of primary topic; the parent album article shouldn't be a thing right now, which would leave the song with the only page by this title. WikiRedactor (talk) 19:56, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- By all means delete the album, but "the only page by this title" doesn't equal primary topic. I believe the surname Froot is more notable than the song. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:51, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- @In ictu oculi: My point is that the album article shouldn't even exist right now; it is only five sentences long (at most) and there is absolutely no information available about it aside from this song being on it. It's not a matter of primary topic; the parent album article shouldn't be a thing right now, which would leave the song with the only page by this title. WikiRedactor (talk) 19:56, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note - It seems that the redirection of the album has been reverted by the article's creator. Not sure what the general standards for Wikipedia:Notability (music) say about this, but it seems relevant.--Yaksar (let's chat) 04:34, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- Weakly support - This really depends if the album stays at its own article or not, but it seems that this would be the primary topic for users using "Froot" as a search term.--Yaksar (let's chat) 00:08, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose: the song will likeliest be as ephemeral as countless other pop music songs that I have seen come and go down the decades. Best Froot to Froot (album) and then Froot (disambiguation) to Froot. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:03, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.