Talk:François Gaston de Lévis

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

merger?

edit
  • I say merge the two articles with François Gaston de Lévis, Duc de Lévis being the entry as Duke was his last and highest noble rank and "chevalier" is but a knight. Plus the chevalier article has his name wrong. -- fdewaele, 29 November 2006, 11:00

You are right

edit

Sorry I spelled the name wrong! That's a big problem, and you're RIGHT about merging my article with the smaller one!

Let's merge very soon

edit
  • We should do the merging very soon. Then, maybe I can re-nominate this and I will be able to get closer, as we will have a lot larger of an article and it will give so much more information. I say we should merge on January 13. Let's talk with the creater of the other article, because he/she may be against it! Thank you very, very, very much for the merger topic! District Attorney 01:32, 11 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:21, 27 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on François Gaston de Lévis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:01, 6 October 2017 (UTC)Reply