Talk:Floods in the United States (1900–1999)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 174.251.135.153 in topic May 11th flood early 1900s sometime

Basic Page Format Believed to Be Complete

edit

The basic setup of this page is now complete, including allowing for multiply cited references, images, and wikilinks. Thegreatdr 14:07, 7 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

1977 southeastern Kentucky flood

edit

i see it mentioned in some town entries but i find no entry of its own and no mention in this list. it should definitely be mentioned here, whether it has its own page or not. Mari Adkins 02:27, 26 March 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MariAdkins (talkcontribs)

Excessive categorization

edit

Would it be acceptable if I deleted most of the "Meteorology in year" categories? After the restructuring of some baseball-related articles, this article will become number 3 in Wikipedia's list of articles with categories. The categories here hinder navigation. Dr. Submillimeter 15:43, 10 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

If you're going to delete some, delete them all. It doesn't make sense to pick and choose years. It would be quite POV. Thegreatdr 16:05, 10 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
I see the problem with my writing style. Yes, I would delete all the "meteorology by year" categories, not just most of them. (However, it would be humorous to leave Category:1927 meteorology for no particular reason.) Dr. Submillimeter 19:01, 11 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Section names and article titles

edit
Hello all, I have been doing cleanup of improper use of capital letters in sections as well as titles. I thought I would drop a few lines here and any related titles.
    • Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Titles#Capitalization states, "However, for names of Wikipedia articles and of section headings in articles and pages, generally only the first word and all proper names are capitalized in titles.". Wikipedia:Article titles#Article title format states, "Use lowercase, except for proper names". This supposedly narrows the criteria to determining if a word is part of such a "proper noun" or named as such as provided by reliable sources as the common name. The word "flood", in these instances, are clearly not part of a proper noun.
I realize that "generally" does mean there are exceptions, such as common use (not just in captions) and cases like the "Great Flood", and I am always a proponent of using the common name when possible (exceptions for avoiding ambiguity) otherwise policy and title consistency should be followed. Otr500 (talk) 20:21, 1 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Floods in the United States: 1901–2000. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:55, 18 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Texas flood of 1913

edit

As written, the article implies that the "new channel" of the Brazos, which empties into the Gulf at Freeport, was created by the 1913 flood. In fact, although the Brazos may have and almost certainly did change course in at least one place due to this flood, the "new channel" of the Brazos is a man-made flood control project that was executed in the 1950s. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.219.170 (talk) 15:58, 2 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Floods in the United States: 1901–2000. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:38, 1 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Floods in the United States: 1901–2000. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:11, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Floods in the United States: 1901–2000. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:06, 2 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

May 11th flood early 1900s sometime

edit

Does anyone know where at on May 11th of a year im not sure of. I've looked and tried to find a specific place which flooded that day but haven't been able to thusfar.Any helps greatly appreciated. 174.251.135.153 (talk) 00:54, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply