Talk:Flat Bastion

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Flat Bastion/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 16:52, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

I'll take up this review. At a first glance it looks compact and well-built (not the bastion!). I mainly focus on copyediting issues. I'll leave some initial comments hopefully by tomorrow at the latest or within a few hours, I'm not quite sure yet. Thanks! Jaguar 16:52, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    It is well referenced.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Initial comments

edit

Lead

edit
  • "In 1859, six guns, four 12-pounders and two 12-pound carronades," - just to clarify here as I'm really not sure, does '12-pound' refer to the weight? If it does refer to the weight can a conversion template be used to convert it into kilos as well? I don't know as I could be wrong!
  • The lead complies per WP:LEAD, nothing else wrong here!
Weight yeah but I'm not sure how you'd do a kilo converter and get it to say "pounder". I suppose I could find the kilo equivalent and put it in notes. I'll do that.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:32, 13 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

History and features

edit
  • "He speculated that Daniel Specklin may have designed it" - for people not familiar with the subject, it's better if this sentence should open by explaining who Daniel Specklin was (engineer, architect). It already says that he's an architect later in the sentence but it would be better if it was mentioned first?

Flat Bastion Magazine

edit
  • "Flat Bastion Magazine had been abandoned for years when Freddie Gomez undertook its restoration. Gomez, whose interests include both history and geology," - who was Gomez? It doesn't say what his profession was

On hold

edit

This article is nearly flawless - it's compact, the prose flows well into each sentence, its broad in its coverage, focused, references are in check... this review even feels like it's too short to tell you the truth but I can't find any more copyediting issues other than those minor ones I had found (and stated above). I'll put this on hold for at least seven days and once those issues have be addressed I'll be very happy to give this article its well deserved GA status! Jaguar 16:18, 13 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

All done I think, thanks for the review! Yeah I've given it a fair old edit and reordering! It's about as comprehensive as it can be on the bastion I'm afraid.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:41, 13 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Close - promoted

edit

That was a fast review. As I mentioned above, I really can't find anything at all wrong with this article short of those copyediting issues which have now been swiftly fixed. Thank you for addressing them so quickly! Looks like another Gibraltar GA! Jaguar 18:02, 13 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Flat Bastion. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:01, 28 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Flat Bastion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:55, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Flat Bastion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:17, 1 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Flat Bastion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:00, 2 October 2017 (UTC)Reply