Talk:Firehose (band)

Name of the band

fIREHOSE is the proper name of this band, and it should remain as such throughout the article. All of their albums have their name like that, All Music Guide has their name like that, and most other websites do also. I don't believe Wikipedia:Manual of Style (capital letters) covers the situation where there is unconventional capitalization of the subject. It is discussed at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (technical restrictions)#Lower case first letter. I believe it used to be not possible to have the initial letter in the title capitalized, but looking at eBay and iPod now I'm not so sure. I was going to move it back, but I guess since fIREHOSE the redirect was edited to remove a category, that is no longer possible without a lot of hassle. I'll leave it as is for now, since seeing FIREHOSE as the article title was kind of annoying anyway. Thoughts? --Joelmills 02:41, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

I guess the title problem has been somewhat fixed, looking at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (technical restrictions)#Lower-case first letters: Looks like it's been fixed. --Joelmills 02:48, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

"I don't believe Wikipedia:Manual of Style (capital letters) covers the situation where there is unconventional capitalization of the subject." Did you actually read it? Just that it appears that unconventional capitalization is exactly what it covers. Chris cheese whine 04:39, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

You might also want to take a look at WP:MOSTM, which covers odd capitalizations of subjects more specifically. Chris cheese whine 04:40, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

I just reread MOS capital letters, and it does not cover this. Please point to the part that you think is applicable. I checked out MOS trademark, and it seems to support not capitalizing the first letter of fIREHOSE - Lowercased trademarks with internal capitals do not need to be capitalized if the second letter is capitalized - although I'm not sure if a band name is considered a trademark. I guess this isn't really that big of a deal, and I don't want to get into any kind of revert war over it. I won't make any more changes unless some other people come here and suggest it. --Joelmills 16:32, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

FIX THIS ARTICLE UP

Man, fIREHOSEs page looks like crap compared to minutemen....... FIX THIS —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.57.130.211 (talk) 19:53, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

It really does look like crap. Go for it, I say. --Joelmills 02:35, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

I tried to fix a few things up, I think it looks alot better. Im trying to find a biography that is better then AMG's, but can't. Any help?? Also, how about somebody makes the article for Mr. Machinery Operator? Dman92 18:14, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

I see you (or someone) made the article for Mr. Machiery Operator, so I'll do one for the Live Totem Pole EP, a personal favorite of mine. --Joelmills 15:00, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Firehosebandpic.jpeg

Image:Firehosebandpic.jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 20:22, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Firehose (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100912034135/http://300songs.com/2010/09/08/46-the-van-part-1-when-i-win-the-lottery-im-gonna-buy-a-new-van/ to http://300songs.com/2010/09/08/46-the-van-part-1-when-i-win-the-lottery-im-gonna-buy-a-new-van/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:26, 6 December 2017 (UTC)