Talk:Fire Station No. 4 (Pawtucket, Rhode Island)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Fire Station No. 4 (Pawtucket, Rhode Island)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 03:08, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Well-written:

With a few grammatical tweaks, the article now complies with policies on layout, grammar and structure. Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 03:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

Verifiable with no original research:

The article cites several reliable publications in its bibliography, and makes appropriately frequent use of them. There does not appear to be any original research. Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 03:28, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

(c) it contains no original research

Broad in its coverage:

The article appears to cover all relevant aspects of its topic for which encyclopedic information was readily available. Nothing trivial seems to have been incorporated. Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 03:27, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

There are no signs of bias exhibited anywhere in the article. Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 03:25, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Immediate view of the revision history shows that the article has not been subjected to edit warring in all its existence. Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 03:10, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

Both images used in the article serve a relevant and informative purpose in illustration. Both are validly licensed, and are accepted on the Wikimedia Commons, so fair use is not a problem. Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 03:11, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

After reading through this article and making a few minor grammatical adjustments, I believe it satisfies the GA criteria. Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 03:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)