Talk:FilKONtario

COI

I would encourage any editor with a close connection to FilKONtario to read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest to avoid appearances of bias when editing this article. It's one of the most important guidelines we have as an encyclopedia. - Dravecky (talk) 19:21, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Have read the guidelines, and I'm sure that I'm in pretty good shape on them myself. I can't speak for everyone else though, and I'm not on Wikipedia everyday, as I'm involved in several large projects right now. That said, send an email to wborean at gmail dot com if there are any problems that you see, and I will respond. I do check email religiously. Make sure that Wikipedia is in the subject line. UrbanTerrorist (talk) 03:48, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

I would also like to point out since Dravecky and I are having a disagreement about another page, and I quite willingly admitted who I was, and what I've done, that if Dravecky had actually taken the time to check the editing of the page, he/she/it would have noticed that I've contributed very little to the page. Oh, I did seed it, but after that I've been mostly concerned with minor details like templates and grammar. In other words, unlike certain other people I could name, I do adopt the neutral POV. UrbanTerrorist (talk) 16:26, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Given the nature of the topic, and the size of the filk community, it would be difficult to find someone who could write knowledgeably about this topic who didn't have a connection to FilKONtario. If, however, anyone feels that any part of the entry is biased or inaccurate, then we could look at that. HScrimgeour (talk) 21:45, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Removed the COI template which I just noticed had been added. I no longer have nothing to do with the convention, and often don't even attend. From that point of view I should write anything about Torcon, Ad Astra, Polaris (Toronto Trek), or Creation since at one time or another I've worked on all of them, even though I don't any more, and I suspect that I don't even know who is currently running any of them, though I knew most of the founders.

As far as COI issues are concerned, as long as you park your ego at the door when editing, and write a balanced article from a third person viewpoint, you are fine. Do read the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest page. If you can't follow it, pass the information you have to another person who doesn't have the emotional connection that you have. UrbanTerrorist (talk) 03:01, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on FilKONtario. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120406145749/http://www.filkontario.ca/hof/hofmain.html to http://www.filkontario.ca/hof/hofmain.html/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:55, 30 September 2017 (UTC)