Talk:Field Cate

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Arthur Rubin in topic WP:NACTOR

mother may be able to help us with his articles

edit

Dear Fieldspring talk:

Although you are Field's mother, and therefore should not edit his WP articles, you still may be able to help us with his articles. You may suggest appropriate improvements on the talk pages, including helpful sources so that we can verify the info before we include it. The main Field Cate article in particular is currently very bare, and could use any helpful suggestions! Perhaps you would also be allowed to add/submit images to WP, that the rest of us might choose to include in articles (getting permission to use images is an issue here, and probably something you could help with). Sorry for the stress you went through learning how things work around here...-69.87.203.60 (talk) 14:37, 10 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Suggestion:

if you publish useful info elsewhere on the internet, and make it as verifiable and notable as possible, you can point us to such material and we may find it helpful. And if you make sure such material has Creative Commons or Public Domain permissions, that could make it even easier for us to incorporate here.-69.87.203.60 (talk) 14:37, 10 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the suggestions. When I get a chance, I will get on this. There used to be a lot more info on his page, and it seems most of it has been taken down, for some reason. Anyway, I'll be in touch...thank you, again! Fieldspring (talk) 08:14, 20 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

much of the items listed as "facts" could be re-purposed as "Family life" or similar. The current layout is worryingly close to a list of trivia and formatting it in a more prose style might help keep trivia happy deletionists from cutting it up. I'm no expert on it but from other biographical articles you might get some ideas of how to format the article differently. Also if you can come up with citations and references from reviews or magazine articles or even DVD commentaries you can go back and reincorporate bits that people deleted from the article, I've managed to double the size of smaller articles just by re-adding things with enough citations to prevent them being removed again. -- Horkana (talk) 23:34, 18 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Field Cate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:26, 31 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Field Cate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

 ? A help request is open: yes. Replace the reason with "helped" to mark as answered.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:02, 30 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

WP:NACTOR

edit

Technically, WP:NACTOR would require that he have significant roles in multiple programs to have an article. The filmography section suggests that he does, but it should be made clear in the body of the article. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 14:54, 2 February 2018 (UTC)Reply