Talk:FIDO Alliance

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Chaosdruid in topic Messy protologisms

.

Improper synthesis in criticism?

edit

The criticism section links to articles saying that FIDO uses secp256r1, and articles saying that secp256r1 may be backdoored, but no articles linking the two together; the synthesis of the two seems to be the work of the editor, and AIUI Not Done on Wikipedia. ciphergoth (talk) 11:37, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

I've removed it. -- The Anome (talk) 10:47, 28 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Parallel Efforts

edit

Are any parallel efforts underway? Are any other organizations addressing similar authentication problems and proposing alternative solution approaches, architectures, and standards? Is the FIDO alliance the only dog in the fight? It would be good if the article can answer these questions. Thanks! --Lbeaumont (talk) 14:56, 4 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on FIDO Alliance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Historical Gaps

edit

While Ramesh Kesanupalli, CTO of Validity Sensors, and Paypal did discuss as early as 2009 as listed on the FIDO website, the notable gap between 2009-2013 was not devoid of activity. Key alliances happened with AuthenTec, Inc., where amongst other things, the alliance's founding charter, legal construct, naming/branding, and cooperative guidelines were forged.

The FIDO branding was created by AuthenTec's Stephanie Griffin, first as a mascot and later transformed into its acronym form.

https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/AuthenTec

HaKerr (talk) 00:58, 6 May 2022 (UTC) This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).Reply

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:51, 27 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Messy protologisms

edit

Hi

The article is peppered with undefined abbreviations and protologisms, I have added some cl-spans which should be explained in plain language, instead of using clique language, such as "over the wire". The average reader will understand much about passwords and protocols, but "authentication over the wire" when using a mobile/cell phone is confusing and needs more explanation.

Thanks Chaosdruid (talk) 17:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply