Talk:Everything in Time

Fair use rationale for Image:EverythinginTimeNoDoubtalbumcover.jpg

Image:EverythinginTimeNoDoubtalbumcover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:42, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Stuff that needs sourcing from liner notes

Many demos were recorded for Return of Saturn and therefore many of the songs were left off the album; some were released as B-sides. "Big Distraction" and "Full Circle" were also released as bonus tracks for international versions of the album. "You're So Foxy" was thought by the band to be a potential single and was initially titled "Agony and Ecstasy". "Everything in Time" was a rare attempt for Gwen Stefani to write a song with her brother Eric after his departure from the band. According to the booklet, it was "a hard one to let go" and another version was recorded for Rock Steady, but didn't fit in and so was left off. The London live version features Madness's organist Mike Barson on piano. "Sailin' On" was recorded in two versions; the second, more dubbed-out mix was selected for the benefit compilation for Surfrider Foundation.

I need to get hold of the liner notes to check this little lot. -- _{Escape Artist Swyer} ^Talk _{Contributions} 21:25, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Everything in Time/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   In the Music section, is this sentence right ---> "Full Circle" is a B-side to the European, European enhanced and Australian CD single releases of "Ex-Girlfriend"?

   Yes, it is, although there should be a comma between "European enhanced" and "Australian". ^Tezkag₇₂ 14:41, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

   Check.

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

   Throughout the article, link "New", "Rock Steady", and "hiatus" to their correspondence articles. In the lead, italicize "Billboard", per here. In the Music section, ""Under Construction" is a B-side to the British CD single releases of "Simple Kind of Life"[12] and "Bathwater"[14].", the period should come before the source. Same section, italicize "The Rugrats Movie". In the Chart positions section, "Billboard" is only supposed to be italicized, not "200".

   Done -- _{Escape Artist Swyer} ^Talk _{Contributions} 22:48, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

   "Rock Steady" (the song) does not have an article. It goes to a song by All Saints. ^Tezkag₇₂ 22:11, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

   I'll have a look.-- _{Escape Artist Swyer} ^Talk _{Contributions}

   No, it doesn't have an article because it wasn't a single.-- _{Escape Artist Swyer} ^Talk _{Contributions} 22:51, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

   Check.

2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   The references will have to be formatted into one accessdate parameter (i.e. no "accessyear".) At the moment, the references are all saying "Accessed on 2008". ^Tezkag₇₂ 15:30, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

   I can't believe I missed that; this would have to be fixed, as well.

   Done. Formatting citations is mindnumbingly boring. -- _{Escape Artist Swyer} ^Talk _{Contributions} 23:45, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

   Check.

   B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

   Does Reference 1 or 2 cover this ---> "No Doubt released their fifth studio album, Rock Steady, in December 2001 and from it released four singles, "Hey Baby", "Hella Good", "Underneath It All" and "Running" between 2001 and 2003"? Source? ---> "under which she released two solo albums: Love. Angel. Music. Baby. on November 22, 2004 and The Sweet Escape on December 4, 2006"?

   Done -- _{Escape Artist Swyer} ^Talk _{Contributions} 22:48, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

   C. It contains no original research:

   Is discogs a reliable source?

   I think so. I think I've seen it on other album GAs. ^Tezkag₇₂ 14:41, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

   Check.

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!

   Do you think they've been answered now? ^Tezkag₇₂ 15:32, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:02, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you to both Tezkag and Escape Artist Swyer for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:21, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Everything in Time. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20141009162417/http://www.billboard.com:80/artist/312357/no+doubt/chart? to http://www.billboard.com/artist/312357/no+doubt/chart
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20141009162417/http://www.billboard.com:80/artist/312357/no+doubt/chart? to http://www.billboard.com/artist/312357/no+doubt/chart

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:56, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Everything in Time. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090223124634/http://www.nodoubt.com/band/ to http://www.nodoubt.com/band/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.billboard.com:80/artist/312357/no
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.billboard.com:80/artist/312357/no

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:30, 27 December 2016 (UTC)