Talk:Everyone's a Critic

NOTE: article was not completed for move, I am following up on this.--み使い Mitsukai 19:33, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

• Article is currently in an AFD status. Recommend article not be moved until completion of AFD process.--み使い Mitsukai 19:33, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

The move should be resubmitted and discussed *after* the AfD discussion is over. —Nightstallion (?) 12:49, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Deletion issues

I removed the deletion request for the following reasons:

1. I submitted a request to move the page from "Everyonesacritic.net" to "Everyone's a Critc" taking the URL out of the title.

2. I reworded the content so it is a description of the community and not an advertisement for the website.

3. Other similar movie websites have entries in Wikipedia that are not submitted for deletion.

If the person who submitted this entry for deletion, continues to do so, I respectfully request that specific reasons are stated in this discussion, so I may know how to continue to change the content to fall within Wikipedia's guidelines.

Don't take this personally, but this article is not encyclopaedic. What you can do to prevent this from being deleted is to edit the article in a way that shows what the site is, who founded it, some history, etc. Example: sentences like "Everyone's a Critic, find yours..." sounds actually as a slogan rather than something you can find on an encyclopaedia, or "Dan, being the receptive webmaster that he is, has been applying many of these new features in a very timely manner." is a direct compliment (thus, completely subjecive)to someone that is not even notable. Any questions?

Ah: there's an alternative way to deal with deletion process and it's AfD. In that process, users vote on the deletion or keeping of the article. Would you prefer that instead of this more "aggresive" Proposed Deletion? --Neigel von Teighen 14:52, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. One quick thing. What does "NN" mean? --Dave Seidner 10:05, 17 February 2006 (EST)

NN = Non notable. In simple words, only few people knows this and it is not worth enough to be in the encyclopaedia (unless you can verify and demonstrate that it is notable). --Neigel von Teighen 15:19, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

{{advert}} tag

The article needs extensive NPOV editing, from logo placement to headers and in-article text. Links to press mentions and awards should be delinked and likely placed as in-line mentions in the article itself (probably under a seperate section called "Press and Awards" or the like).--み使い Mitsukai 19:55, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Logo5b.gif

Image:Logo5b.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

This Logo was created by Dan Seidner, the owner of everyonesacritic.net. It is posted on the everyonesacritic.net wikipedia article with full permission from Dan Seidner, the owner of the image and website in which the article is about. --Dave 11:52, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Logo5b.gif

Image:Logo5b.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

This Logo was created by Dan Seidner, the owner of everyonesacritic.net. It is posted on the everyonesacritic.net wikipedia article with full permission from Dan Seidner, the owner of the image and website in which the article is about. --Dave 11:52, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Everyone's a Critic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060515011607/http://www.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~schuetze/ws2004ir/clustering/clustering.pdf to http://www.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~schuetze/ws2004ir/clustering/clustering.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060220042644/http://www.penncen.com/7wonders/7apr03.html to http://www.penncen.com/7wonders/7apr03.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130716024358/http://whichcritic.com/ to http://www.whichcritic.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:20, 20 January 2018 (UTC)