Talk:Ethiopian Airlines/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Plarem in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer:Plarem (User | talk | contribs)   21:35, 23 August 2011 (UTC) This article is still under reviewReply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    The spelling and grammar follow an established system and the meaning of each paragraph is clear and not confusing, follows Wikipedia's Manual of Style.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    There are enough references according to me. Citations are to highly reliable sources: Boeing's website, Royal Norwegian Embassy, NY Times, NYCAviation and the Ethiopian Airlines website news. I can find no original research.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    It contains the major aspects of the subject, without going into unecessary detail.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    All seems pretty reasonable to me.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
    I can spot no edit wars on this article.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    All the images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales, the pictures are use appropiately and have suitable captions.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Plarem (User | talk | contribs)   15:47, 24 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Passed – I pass this article to GA Standard. – Plarem (User | talk | contribs)   15:47, 24 August 2011 (UTC)Reply