Talk:English Spot

{{WikiProject Mammals—Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.110.204.154 (talk) 20:49, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Untitled

Future plans include expanding the appearnce section and adding sections about breed variety, breed temperament, and breed living needs Trio32 (talk) 00:13, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

This page still needs pictures, so if you have any pictures of an English Spot you are willing to share, please help. I'm also looking for feed back on what else should be included on this page, so if you have any ideas, please let me know. Trio32 (talk) 22:17, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

This page still needs pictures and feedback on what else to include. I have added categories, so that problem should be fixed. Trio32 (talk) 20:55, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Feedback

I've left comments in the Talk banner above, but I was wondering if the image used really belongs to Trio32, or if it was taken off an organization's website. If the latter, than it needs to be moved to Wikipedia's image hosting, the copyright changed, and a fair-use rationale added - if otherwise, i apologize, but there are many people who mistakenly upload images they've found as public domain. -ΖαππερΝαππερ ^Babel_Alexandria 17:00, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on English Spot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081220133544/http://www.geocities.com:80/englishspotlover/The_Spotted_Beauty.html to http://www.geocities.com/englishspotlover/The_Spotted_Beauty.html/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:52, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:English Spot/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

*Reference relation to English Butterfly - any number of organizations are sure to have written an article on this theory. Remove quote in lead as unencyclopedic, there are thousands of random opinions on the internet about breeds of pets, barring a quote from someone notable for having English Spots, it's not a good idea to include quoted descriptions (however true they may be). History section is interesting, informative, and encyclopedic - again, find a ref for "is thought to have come from the English Butterfly." In Description you mention "herringbone" and "hearingbone" is this a typo or are these intentionally two different things? It would be helpful to find/create a free image that labels key points on a rabbit that are used in form and marking judgement (this image can also be used in other breed articles, see Image:Anatomy dog.png) The Lifestyle section, i assume, is not really specific to English Spots (i.e. all/most rabbits need daily excercise, are crepescular and nocturnal). As such it's completely unneeded in this article. Likewise, the second paragraph of the Breeding section should be removed, it is not only unspecific to English Spots, but it's instructional. The first paragraph also seems unspecific to this breed (gestation, litter size, and the ease of fostering young are generally the same for the whole species, am i wrong?), except for the part about "charlies," and litter %, which is mildly useful. If those are really the only sentences that can be kept, then they should be reworked into Description. minor tweak it might be nice to have the lead image put into some kind of infobox, but the other problems should be addressed first. -ΖαππερΝαππερ BabelAlexandria 16:55, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Last edited at 16:55, 13 November 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 14:32, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on English Spot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080222040549/http://www.animalnetwork.com/critters/profiles/rabbit/species.asp to http://www.animalnetwork.com/Critters/profiles/rabbit/species.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Most external links dead

Maybe they can be found in the wayback machine? --RichardAlexanderHall (talk) 18:45, 17 January 2018 (UTC)