Talk:Engel expansion

Latest comment: 1 year ago by KlokkoVanDenBerg in topic Additive version

Uniqueness

edit

The example

 

given in the article shows that the non-decreasing sequence of positive integers which is an Engel expansion for a fixed positive number is not unique for rational numbers (if one allows finite sequences). --91.32.82.49 (talk) 19:13, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

As the article says, every positive rational number has a unique finite Engel expansion and a unique infinite Engel expansion. The example shows how the finite and infinite Engel expansions are related. Gandalf61 (talk) 10:25, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
But then it shows the Engel expansion is NOT, as the article says, unique. I guess, but I can not immediately see if it's true, the article should mention, a rational number has a unique finite and a unique infinite expansion. Madyno (talk) 08:22, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
The article already says: "Every positive rational number has a unique finite Engel expansion. ... Every rational number also has a unique infinite Engel expansion" What part of this do you think is ambiguous or missing? —David Eppstein (talk) 17:05, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Well, the first sentence is not correct: The Engel expansion of a positive real number x is the unique non-decreasing sequence of positive integers.
Some numbers have more than one, in fact two, expansions. Madyno (talk) 15:43, 1 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Negative numbers in Engel expansion?

edit

Are there ever negative integers in these expansions, especially in alternation with positive integers? For example, the Julian year's length of 365.2425 days is implemented in leap days via the expansion 365 + 1/41/100 + 1/400. 𝕃eegrc (talk) 17:40, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

As it says fairly prominently in the article, Engel expansions themselves are all positive, but there is a version with alternating signs, called the Pierce expansion. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:33, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thank you 𝕃eegrc (talk) 14:28, 18 July 2016 (UTC)Reply


Additive version

edit

does a additive version exists? like how for for example 2 is

 

Does such a thing exist as well for sqrt(2) --KlokkoVanDenBerg (talk) 02:36, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply