Talk:Ema Zajmović

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BorgQueen (talk) 20:23, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

Ema Zajmović

• ... that poker player Ema Zajmović (pictured) received a wrestling-style belt when she won a World Poker Tour event in Montreal? Source: WPT: "Ever since Zajmovic saw two of her friends win WPT events at Playground Poker Club in Montreal and earn the belt, akin to the kind awarded in boxing and wrestling, it has been on Zajmovic’s mind ... She wanted the championship belt ... She got it." Photo of the belt
  • ALT1: ... that Bosnian-born poker player Ema Zajmović (pictured) is the first woman to win an open-entry Main Event on the World Poker Tour? Source: WPT: "Specifically in regards to a female player winning an open-entry event on the WPT Main Tour ... Zajmovic won the partypoker.net WPT Playground event, becoming the first female WPT champion of an open buy-in event."
  • ALT2: ... that Bosnian-born poker player Ema Zajmović (pictured) is the only woman to win an open-entry Main Event on the World Poker Tour? Source: From tournament page in Jan 2022: "Ema Zajmovic is the only woman to ever win an open WPT Main Tour event." Source isn't super recent, but the full list on wiki doesn't appear to belie the fact ... anyway it'd be fine to go with either of the other hooks.
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Dave Kufeld

Created by Hameltion (talk). Self-nominated at 22:50, 26 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Ema Zajmović; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

• I will review this in the coming days! WatkynBassett (talk) 19:16, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
• The article is new enough: created on 26 April 2023, nominated on that day.
• The article has over 1500 characters of readable prose.
• The article is sourced. I did spot checks on the first few sources and they checked out - only the exact birthday could not established independently by myself through the sources.
• The article is written in a neutral and non-promotional tone.
• I did not find copyvios and Earwig did not pick up anything of importance.
• Hook
  • I think ALT2 should unfortunately not be used (as you anticipated) due to the age of the source.
  • The original hook has the right length and is cited. It is interesting.
  • ALT1 is cited and interesting and also of the right length.
• Image review: I think this image is appropriately licensed (but I am no copyright expert) and easily discernible at small size. I think this is fine.
• QPQ done
  • Conclusion: First of all: @Hameltion: Sorry for the delay in reviewing this and thank you for creating free and open knowledge! I approve the original and the ALT1 hook - may the promoter decide which one is more interesting! If the promoter is knowledgeable about copyright, I would appreciate a second look at the licensing of the image. WatkynBassett (talk) 20:17, 6 June 2023 (UTC)