Talk:Eliza Manningham-Buller

Latest comment: 4 months ago by Dormskirk in topic "She worked for K-branch against the IRA."

Info

edit

The information about her husband is enough to identify him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.139.116.106 (talk) 15:45, 8 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

But would be insufficient for the purposes of obtaining Working Tax Credits.79.70.237.254 (talk) 22:48, 16 July 2012 (UTC)twl79.70.237.254 (talk) 22:48, 16 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

User:81.139.116.106 is assuming that I don't want anyone to identify him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:5B9A:E01:387F:5803:8D0E:76B4 (talk) 13:54, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Eliza Manningham-Buller. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:16, 22 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Pigeons

edit

Pigeons are mentioned in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.48.174.102 (talk) 17:23, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

"She worked for K-branch against the IRA."

edit

This sentence has no citation and is not elaborated, nor can I find other references to "K-branch" on Wikipedia or elsewhere.

The closest thing I can find is this FAQ from MI5, https://www.mi5.gov.uk/faq, which suggests that "K" was a shorthand for what later became MI5 ("Thereafter, Kell, or 'K', was responsible for counter-espionage within the British Isles while Cumming, or 'C', had responsibility for gathering intelligence overseas. The two divisions became MI5 and MI6 respectively."). But this would suggest there can't have been a "K-branch" of MI5, and at any rate the FAQ seems to indicate that this terminology hasn't been used since the 1940s ("the Director General of MI5 has not been known as 'K' since the 1940s"), long before Lady Manningham-Buller started working in intelligence.

TLDR: This sentence should either be cited and explained, or deleted. Mosi Nuru (talk) 17:03, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Removed for now until it can be properly sourced. Dormskirk (talk) 17:07, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply