Talk:Egmont Group

Untitled

arch merge or split with Egmont (media group)

i beleive that it should merge somewhat with Egmont (media group). Yousou (talk) 22:35, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Title change

Hi I would like to request that the title of this article is changed to {Egmont (media group)}, so that I can provide more info about Egmont, and therefore keep al the information in one article. --Pbrun (talk) 13:15, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Title change

The title of the Egmont Group (publishing) article is misleading, since only part of Egmont involves publishing, therefore I recommend that the article is called Egmont media group is more suited.

What does it take to make this change? --Pbrun (talk) 18:16, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

The term "publishing" encompasses a lot more than just book and magazine printed matter nowadays. I'd rather have simply re-titled it Egmont Group; but that is somebody else. Egmont started out as a traditional publishing firm, and that is still where they are by far the best known. Let's concentrate on improving the article with solid references. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:57, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Yeah you are right that they print magazines, cartoons and books, and the publishing is being used in wider range then earlier, it is just that they also distribute Playstation products, run communities, produce film, runs a tv2 in Norway and that the firm speaks of it self as a media group. --Pbrun (talk) 08:04, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

New key figures

The page currently shows 2010 figures. In 2012 revenue is up to 1.6 billion EUR. Employees is now 6400 (in 2012). Sources are http://www.egmont.com/Press/news-and-press-releases/Egmont-achieved-new-record-profit/ and http://www.egmont.com/About-Egmont/Key-figures-and-annual-reports/. Will someone please make the change? Jonassmith (talk) 15:09, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Move Egmont UK section to its own page

I suggest moving the "UK Branch" section to its own page entitled Egmont UK. As it is, the "UK Branch" section takes up disproportional space as it is "just" one of many Egmont companies. For reference, Egmont UK's website is at http://www.egmont.co.uk/ Jonassmith (talk) 06:47, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Change suggestions: Business areas and key figures

I suggest the following changes:

Firstly, 'music' is no longer part of Egmont's business areas and has not been so for a long time so that should be deleted in the main text.

Secondly, the key figures displayed on the site are outdated. Revenue, operating income, total equity, number of employees, total Foundation donations. These should be changed in the fact box and in the article text to match 2013 figures as available in the official press release of March 18, 2014: http://www.egmont.com/int/Press/news-and-press-releases/Egmont-sets-new-record/#.U19kZIF_t8F The press release should at the same time be listed as a reference.

Will anybody please be helpful and make the changes? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jespermikk (talk • contribs) 08:58, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Egmont Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717041143/http://www.egmont.co.uk/default.asp?pageid=29 to http://www.egmont.co.uk/default.asp?pageid=29

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:23, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Egmont Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720075859/http://blogs.birminghammail.net/speechballoon/2008/12/speaking-frankly.html to http://blogs.birminghammail.net/speechballoon/2008/12/speaking-frankly.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:33, 18 September 2017 (UTC)