Talk:Eddystone (Tasmania)

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Article is confusing

edit

This article is confusing and should probably be separated into two separate articles.

  1. . The intro sentence says Eddystone is near South East Cape, and also in the South West National Park. It can't be in both areas.
  2. . Eddystone Point is in the North East of Tasmania, a separate location entirely.

Someone might like to fix these problems. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guyburns (talkcontribs) 15:47, 21 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

In reference to the two points above:
  1. . South East Cape is in the South West National Park. It is also the southern most point of Australia (excluding minor islands and territories). Therefore it would make sense if the small islands were within South West National Park. However I do not know this for certain.
  2. . The Eddystone Point lighthouse entry does not belong on this page as it referes to the NE Tasmania landmark.
---- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ninox8 (talkcontribs) 02:27, 26 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Eddystone (Tasmania). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:50, 20 December 2016 (UTC)Reply