Talk:Ecosystem collapse
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Ecological collapse page were merged into Ecosystem collapse on October 2023. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2021 and 7 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): TurtlePond20. Peer reviewers: SaveTheTrees3, Mycelia225.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:27, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Copyright issues
editThe first sentence of the article is copy/pasted from this source and the "Risk of collapse" section close paraphrases the same source. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:20, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
- That document is under "Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)", I thought it was Ok. Anyway, I changed both sections to avoid any problems. --Jrfep (talk) 12:08, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Merging ecological collapse into this article
edit- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Merge approved. InformationToKnowledge (talk) 14:46, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Simply put: not only is ecological collapse a small, Start-class article, but more importantly, this term is not used in any of the WP:RS cited, all of which simply refer to ecosystem collapse (if they refer to a collapse in the first place). The only inline citation which appears to use this term is a 2012 article from a website called "TreeHugger", which is clearly not considered a reliable source. Neither the original study, nor a contemporary BBC article about it actually use this wording. Without it, all of the content can be easily merged into this article. InformationToKnowledge (talk) 13:36, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support - the proposal to merge makes sense to me. EMsmile (talk) 08:13, 17 July 2023 (UTC)