this might be a less politically charged image

edit

 

I think this image is probable less POV than the one on the page - unless someone can cite a source for the 0.8 HDI being the minimum for high human development.

What do you think ? EdwardLane (talk) 08:41, 28 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Ecological Debt Day & Earth Overshoot Day

edit

Prior to some recent edits, this article focused more on Ecological Debt Day. With those edits, the history of Ecological Debt Day has been replaced by a history of Earth Overshoot Day. It is not clear to me that these are the same. Please discuss here... Thanks, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 01:50, 7 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

translate article in german

edit

Hi, I translated this article into german and was wondering how I can put it on wikipedia? also, how can I link the english page to the german page? Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Global Footprint Network (talkcontribs) 17:43, 14 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

See: de:Wikipedia:Hauptseite. Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 21:43, 14 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Repetition, Clarity, and Additions

edit

It seems as though this article could benefit from fine-tuning when it comes to grammar and sentence clarity. When referring to Global Footprint Network, it becomes repetitive. Perhaps refer to it as GFN or continue the paragraph in context relating to it.

Global Footprint Network seems to also have been mistakenly hyperlinked twice.

I would also recommend being more precise when saying things like "They admit..." or "According to them...", since they are claims, they need sources each time. Samsmith428 (talk) 22:05, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

More content needs to be added to debunk this pseudoscience

edit

This page is describing a pseudoscience concept that should be more clearly pointed out rather than making people believe it's a legitimate environmental data point. Ergzay (talk) 16:16, 28 July 2022 (UTC)Reply