This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject College basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College basketballWikipedia:WikiProject College basketballTemplate:WikiProject College basketballcollege basketball
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The category has 2 articles, and by existing is supporting a total of 3 categories. This is truly excessive. There is no reason to have any categories with under 5 articles. Even that is too small really to justify categories unless they are part of a large scheme. The Babson Beavers category itself only has 4 articles. There is no reason to subdivide a 4 article category at all. This whole scheme is a set of small categories that have no good reason to exist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:10, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
If something does not make enough difference to someone's life that we bother having text about it in the article on the person, we should not have a category on it. If it is so minor that it is buried in a table and not mentioned in the normal text of the article, I do not believe we can say it is defining enough to matter enough to have a category, and we would be best off not categorizing by it.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:12, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
The body of article is clearly underdeveloped. We've been over this before. Assistant coaching tenures are indeed defining. Jweiss11 (talk) 04:25, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
