Talk:Dominion: Prequel to the Exorcist

Fair use rationale for Image:Dominion A Prequel to the Exorcist poster.JPG

Image:Dominion A Prequel to the Exorcist poster.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Untitled

Did this movie really only gross $250,000 with a $30M budget? Or is it a mistake? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.84.75.244 (talk) 03:07, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dominion: Prequel to the Exorcist. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080521033925/http://www.avclub.com:80/content/node/18808 to http://www.avclub.com/content/node/18808/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060626175600/http://boxofficeprophets.com:80/tickermaster/listing.cfm?TMID=2453 to http://www.boxofficeprophets.com/tickermaster/listing.cfm?TMID=2453

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:18, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dominion: Prequel to the Exorcist. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304100211/http://www.warnerbros.com/dominion-prequel-exorcist to http://www.warnerbros.com/dominion-prequel-exorcist

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:10, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Pazuzu?

I've just watched this movie and can't remember any references to Pazuzu. But regardless, these movies are about this "demon", so shouldn't that name be mentioned anywhere? I was thinking to make a note on that in the cast section about Billy Crawford. Any objections? Karel Adriaan (talk) 16:29, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

"The film was a financial disaster."

This sentence under Box Office seems like it doesn't fit Wiki standards. If a reputable source can be quoted as saying that, it'd be different. Also no financials are added to bolster the statement. Admittedly, the financials on this particular film are complicated by the limited release (it would have been impossible to make a theatrical profit if the screen count topped out in the low 100s), the budgets added to the reshot version, and then post-production finishing...making it hard to extract this film's budget from the Harlin cut.