Talk:Die Hochzeit

This article falls within the scope of the Richard Wagner WikiProject, a collaboration to develop articles on the composer and his operas. The project talk page is a place to discuss issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!Richard WagnerWikipedia:WikiProject Richard WagnerTemplate:WikiProject Richard WagnerRichard Wagner

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Infobox?

Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

I suggest an infobox, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:02, 22 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

done --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:24, 26 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Apologies Gerda, only just seen this. I don't think it very appropriate. Have removed it pending further discussion. I suggest that if you are going to add these boxes as you have at other Wagner operas, you raise the issue first at WP:Opera and WP:Wagner: I am flagging the matter there.--Smerus (talk) 10:10, 27 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

I think on this one, though short, the small infobox is OK, and the young Wagner image is interesting. Montanabw ^(talk) 03:44, 28 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Die Hochzeit/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

Middle of Stub range (18 points). There may be limited scope for developing this article. After all it's a non-existent opera. (Possibly better not to have started it?). However some things can be done:

Give full details of the recording and any others, including the name of the author of the booklet.
Check references in the main biographical works to see if there is any background information that can be added.

-- Kleinzach 01:04, 7 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Since this isn't really an opera, it can't be assessed according to the Project's opera articles points system or Opera Quality Scale. I have therefore used the WP grading scheme, and it seems to me to be low Start-class rather than Stub-class. As noted above, there probably isn't a lot more that can be said (and it's not clear that there are any recordings of what still exists, which, incidentally, is more than just a septet), but the article can certainly be improved by the addition of extra background information, including the source for the libretto. --GuillaumeTell 21:30, 19 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Start. I tend to agree that the opera marking scheme can't be properly applied here and would distort the assessment. There is enough basic information here the article to have some use to readers. Therefore I'm inclined to give it a low start per GT. I agree that Newman or another biography should be used to look for information. And from what GT says, there obviously is more information available. It therefore ought to be able to develop the article sufficiently to in theory reach GA standard.--Peter cohen 11:59, 20 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 11:59, 20 September 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 13:24, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Add topic