Talk:Design for Living (film)
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | A fact from Design for Living (film) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 March 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Internet Movie Database
editThis is not a reliable source to use in the article; IMDb's trivia pages are notorious for being user-submitted and without attribution. I would recommend searching the keywords of whatever information appears useful and finding a more reputable source to cite instead. —Erik (talk • contrib) 14:58, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Box Office
editIn the top section, the film is called a "box office success." However, scrolling down to the "Reception" section, we're told the film was a "box office disappointment." Unless the film somehow managed to make money and still disappoint, one of these claims is mistaken. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.88.64.228 (talk) 08:05, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Additionally Wikipedia has a page with the top 10 highest-grossing films of 1933, and 'Design for Living' is not among them: [[1]] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deepstructure (talk • contribs) 10:02, 23 December 2020 (UTC)