Talk:Descendants of Smith
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Klbrain in topic Proposed merge with Garden of Uranium
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | The contents of the Garden of Uranium page were merged into Descendants of Smith on 7 October 2017. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Proposed merge with Garden of Uranium
editSimply a reissue, under another title. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:32, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
- Will any information be lost? Or will it all transpose to the new page? Stephenjh (talk) 15:34, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Anyone? This is the discussion page right. Stephenjh (talk) 11:36, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- No discussion here leads me to believe, that after three months, this proposed merge tag can be removed. Furthermore, are all reissues to be merged? If so, why is there a separate category for reissued albums? Are they all due to be merged? "Category:Reissue albums" Stephenjh (talk) 06:32, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- No the tag should not be removed. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Well, how long does the 'discussion' (that isn't happening) take? Stephenjh (talk) 12:07, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- WP:NODEADLINE. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:39, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Well, how long does the 'discussion' (that isn't happening) take? Stephenjh (talk) 12:07, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- No the tag should not be removed. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- No discussion here leads me to believe, that after three months, this proposed merge tag can be removed. Furthermore, are all reissues to be merged? If so, why is there a separate category for reissued albums? Are they all due to be merged? "Category:Reissue albums" Stephenjh (talk) 06:32, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- No; no information should be lost. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Confirming that no information will be lost and it will redirect. Given the absence of objections (except on the grounds of no action), and the presence of a clear justification (initial proposal), I'll take action and merge. Klbrain (talk) 11:03, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Anyone? This is the discussion page right. Stephenjh (talk) 11:36, 12 July 2015 (UTC)