Talk:Democratic Labour Party (Brazil)

Fair use rationale for Image:Pdt-logo.jpg

Image:Pdt-logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:49, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Ideology

Is PDT democratic-socialist or social-democratic? --Checco (talk) 10:58, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

It's difficult to classify Brazilian parties, as their ideology is very diffuse and often varies from region to region, but I would say that both social-democratic and democratic-socialist could apply to individual members - although I tend to see PDT more as a populist-leaning social-democratic party, whose rhetoric is rarely matched by their actions when in power. Back in the 80s, the party was created with the goal of becoming a moderate, so-called "reformist" alternative to Communist parties, founded in the tradition of left-wing varguistas, but the emergence of PT and its closer ties to trade unions definitely shifted this alignment. So probably "social-democratic" would be more accurate.Ko'oy (talk) 12:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

I see it as more leftist, thus I would say "democratic-socialist", but if you say "socia-democratic", let it be "social-democratic"! (Also Itanesco agrees with you.) --Checco (talk) 15:29, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Democratic Labour Party (Brazil). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051105034003/http://www.juventudesocialista.org.br/ to http://www.juventudesocialista.org.br/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:41, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Ideology

Democratic Labour Party isn't a left-wing nationalist party? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4451:1216:1100:C83:71BB:38FA:8196 (talk) 03:52, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

I thought, "Maybe I misunderstand what the word 'ideology' means," so I looked it up in Merriam-Webster and got this:

Definition of ideology

1a: a manner or the content of thinking characteristic of an individual, group, or culture

b: the integrated assertions, theories and aims that constitute a sociopolitical program

That being the case, I don't see any ideology in the Ideology section beyond, maybe, ill-defined labels. Instead, Beyond the first sentence there is just a continuation of the history of various entities' formation, naming, alliances or antagonisms, and horse race results.

The entire section needs reworking. Dgndenver (talk) 06:46, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

It is. Read the Carta de Lisboa. In the coming days I'd like to reform most of this article and some related ones as well. ~~

Fist and rose

If someone has reliable sources on the party’s use of the fist and rose emblem, do contribute to Fist and rose#Brazil. Keriluamox (talk) 11:00, 23 November 2022 (UTC)