Delaware Route 300 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Delaware Route 300/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 22:52, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Will review tomorrow.♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:52, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Please add a route map for google/bing.
- Requested for one to be made. Dough4872 19:10, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
- KML added. Dough4872 18:07, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
- Lead
Please mention road length.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
Seems to meet requirements. But I would strongly recommend you take Freddie's advice and learn how to create the maps and links. I think they are very important to writing about roads.♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:18, 29 February 2012 (UTC)