Talk:Delaware Route 12
Latest comment: 12 years ago by MathewTownsend in topic GA Review
 | Delaware Route 12 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Delaware Route 12/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 18:57, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
- Will review shortly. MathewTownsend (talk) 18:57, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
- review
Very good over all - just a few picks which aren't major and won't prevent promotion.
- "DE 12 begins at the Maryland border, where it continues west into that state as MD 314." - I'm confused about exactly where it ceases to be MD 314 and becomes DE12.
- Reworded to clarify. Dough4872 17:55, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
- I see it's specified in the table. It's in Felton? (or before Felton?)
- It is west of Felton in an unincorporated area. As there is no town at the state line, that field is left blank. Dough4872 17:55, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
- A map would be very helpful.
- WP:USRD/MTF is dead right now, such a request would likely take a while to complete. Dough4872 17:55, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
- I like that you add pictures of the road!
Will put on hold for your reply.
MathewTownsend (talk) 17:43, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, I have replied to the above comments. Dough4872 17:55, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks. It's clearer now. MathewTownsend (talk) 18:01, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:
- B. Complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. Prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Provides references to all sources:
- B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. Provides references to all sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Main aspects are addressed:
- B. Remains focused:
- A. Main aspects are addressed:
- Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass!
- Pass or Fail:
Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 18:01, 3 July 2012 (UTC)