This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 14 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion
Regarding the deletion of an out-of-date image. debivort, as you noted the artwork in the image has been gone from the museum for 2+ years. The fact that the page isn't image-rich doesn't seem a good reason to keep an inaccurate image up. How about posting a more current image of one of the 70 artworks that are there currently? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dkois (talk • contribs) 21:58, 6 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
And in the interest of full disclosure, I should point out I am the museum director. Open to other suggestions for image ideas, but it is not conducive to accuracy or expectations of visitors who visit the physical site to have old artworks represent the institution publiclyDkois (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:01, 6 May 2010 (UTC).Reply
Hello - I still don't think you have given a reason not to have the image. Most people who visit the article will not visit the museum, and it will be much more useful to them to see multiple images that convey the diversity of sculptures at the museum, rather than just a single image. To the typical article reader, it will be essentially inconsequential that the sculpture is no longer there. That said, I can see why you would feel as you do given your position in the institution. I think you just need to think more broadly about the image's utility in the encyclopedia. deBivort01:07, 7 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
Was there a reason you removed the only photo of actual sculptures? The rest of the changes seem fine, but don't address whether the article should include images of sculptures formerly there. deBivort17:27, 31 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
Ok, as requested, I added a more recent photo of sculpture in the garden. I also added CommonsCat since there were several other photos related to the museum in there. You might want to move your photo to Commons... dm (talk) 22:45, 31 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
