Talk:David Peters (paleoartist)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by I am a Green Bee in topic New reconstructions
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Claims
editThe claims section should absolutely be included, there is no more reliable source on Peters' notoriously controversial claims than Peters himself. Wolfemoods (talk) 21:32, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Read WP:BLPSPS, particularly criterion 1:
it is not unduly self-serving
. Peters has spouted so many claims over the years that there's no way that they could all be reasonably be included. Users deciding based on their owns whims which of his claims are the most notorious or infamous is an act of WP:OR. Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:38, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
New reconstructions
editMost of his reconstructions are bad, but his verions of Coelurosauravus, Ubirajara, Yi qi, and Ambopteryx make sense. I am a Green Bee (talk) 17:43, 26 August 2023 (UTC)