This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
Latest comment: 3 months ago7 comments2 people in discussion
What a disappointment. Seriously. I LOVED the other picture of David Lewis, he had a great beard a smile in his eyes and (it appears) relaxing in his backyard. Now we have this Black and White picture of what? A high school year book photo? Cmon. I was so inspired by the previous picture for years and always imagined myself growing old doing philosophy in my backyard just like I imagined David doing in his backyard (sans beard). It reflects the joy of his character so much better than the new one. I mean the man's pen name comes from his cat. He deserves and equally tender and spirited photo to be remembered by. Non-pegasus (talk) 02:42, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Aza24 I can't compare revisions on my phone. You reverted an edit in April due to a copyroght issue, were we removing the photo that had been here for years or a different one, if you can remember? Non-pegasus (talk) 02:45, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Non-pegasus, the image you are probably talking about was deleted at the commons, because there was no evidence it was in public domain (removed off this page by a different editor, see [1]). The image I removed had only been on the page for a few weeks, and it was deleted because it was simply pulled right from Britannica, also without a valid licensing tag.
@Non-pegasus, I much agree that the former image (the one with the hat, I presume?) was much better and more characteristic. Let me mull over this, we could argue that the current one doesn't represent him at all—as a college student yearbook picture—so a copyrighted version would be vastly more ideal. Aza24 (talk)12:09, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
I don't know about any picture of wearing a hat actually hah. (Let me know where I might see it and I can see if it's in public domain?) Copy and paste this into your browser and scroll down to see the picture I'm referring to: https://blogs.princeton.edu/manuscripts/2016/04/25/david-k-lewis-and-analytical-philosophy/. This is the picture that had been used as the page's primary image for years. Note that this image from Princeton's site has a copyright with the name "Hugh Mellor." I am willing to bet this is the same "Hugh Mellor" who was a metaphysics professor at Cambridge and likely knew Lewis professionally, seeing as the image was taken apparently on Cambridge grounds (and not, as I assumed, in his backyard!). Unfortunately, Hugh Mellor is deceased. After browsing obituaries, there is no mention of his surviving family who may have managed his estate, including intellectual property (the memorials are beautiful, by the way, people really loved this teacher). I guess one could do a deeper dive and find an indirect way to obtain fair use, but personally it's not worth it, and I say that as someone who really loved that picture of David Lewis. Alas, I can live with this new pic. At least he's cute there ;). Thanks for considering it. I might change my mind and find a better pic. Another time, maybe. 🦄 Non-pegasus (talk) 23:15, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply