Talk:Darla (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GRAPPLE X 12:18, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

Eurgh, Buffy. I seem to have a habit of finding Julie Benz-related articles to review. It might be a sign.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Prose is grand, no issues there.

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   MOS-compliance seems fine to me.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

   Everything seems cited fine, though a large portion of the references seem to just be episodes. Not a problem here but it might be if you go to take it further.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

   Scope seems okay. Maybe centred a bit heavily on Benz's personal experiences but that might be unavoidable. The writers' views of the character might be a nice addition for the future if you can track something down.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   Neutrality is fine.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   Stability is grand.

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Commons image isn't a worry, and the FUR used for the non-free image is impeccable.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Straight-up pass for this one, since I'm not seeing anything that would hold it back. Well done!