Talk:Dark Frontier

Latest comment: 12 years ago by 207.255.204.36 in topic Sidenote Incorrect

Fair use rationale for Image:ST-VOY Dark Frontier,Part2.jpg

edit
 

Image:ST-VOY Dark Frontier,Part2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:32, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Copy/paste from cited source

edit

The summaries contain quite a bit of content straight from the cited sources. Pinochet (3) (talk) 08:09, 15 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sidenote Incorrect

edit

In the current Sidenote section, it states "...where it is described by Janeway as a Borg 'transwarp coil.'", however this is incorrect. During that scene, Janeway is talking about a transwarp coil when she appears to assume the circular object is the coil. Ens. Kim then warns her to put down the object stating they didn't know what it was, but it was crawling around on the floor earlier. Sorry if this isn't formatted correctly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.255.204.36 (talk) 02:34, 26 March 2012 (UTC)Reply