Talk:Dai Ichi Daihoumaru Ship case

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Toobigtokale in topic Copyright violation and neutrality

Extreame POV

edit

This article reads extremely POV and biased, with no attempt to be neutral or present the other side, and needs to be rewritten. 178.15.145.204 (talk) 12:24, 13 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Location

edit

Where did it happen and who had jurisdiction, Japan? South Korea? Hugo999 (talk) 04:50, 4 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

I just blanked much of the article, explaining reasoning here.

First and most importantly, it was a copyright violation. It's a translation of copyrighted material that doesn't fall under fair use because it's an extensive reproduction.

Second, it was unacceptably non-neutral. Not saying this because I'm offended (I'm totally willing to believe it was an act of unprovoked barbarism from the South Korean side), I'm saying this because for an event that's this controversial and inflammatory, the bar for quality is much, much higher. Only a single POV is prevented that uses clearly non-neutral harsh language.

If you'd like to view what the article used to say, this is the last revision before my blanking. toobigtokale (talk) 19:59, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply