Talk:D.D.E. (band)
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Comments
edit"The group has become the most selling band in Norwegian history, even beating a-ha, with 10 albums to date, including two compilation albums."
Impossible.. How many records have A-ha sold worldwide? Like 50 million?
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.167.145.26 (talk • contribs) 16:39, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Requested move 13 December 2013
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Armbrust The Homunculus 01:49, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
D.D.E. → D.D.E. (band) – this is clearly not the most prominent usage of the abbreviation "D.D.E.", many more common uses are found at the disambiguation page DDE (disambiguation), which are also spelled as "D.D.E." and "D. D. E." depending on your grammatical pedantry, or what era/region the abbreviation was created. So, the band should be renamed, and the resultant redirects D.D.E. and D. D. E. and variants, should all repoint to the disambiguation page DDE. -- 65.94.78.9 (talk) 06:59, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support - Good catch. Next editor couldn't this be done as an uncontroversial move? In ictu oculi (talk) 08:38, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support per nom. bd2412 T 17:03, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support – a topic with no sources can never be the primarytopic for an ambiguous term, can it? Dicklyon (talk) 06:42, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.