 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
[Untitled]
editCan someone please check whether this topic is coherent and not a nonsense hoax? If so, remove the expert tag. Stifle (talk) 14:59, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- I don't know whether you'll believe me, since I wrote the article, but I assure you that it's not a hoax. You can look at Grothendieck's original work in EGA if you download it from [1]. Gruson–Raynaud is in a journal, unfortunately, so unless you're at a university or research institution you're unlikely to have access.
- Take heart; this subject is considered difficult even among mathematicians in this field. Ozob (talk) 19:57, 28 March 2010 (UTC)