Talk:Cyclones BOB 03 and Yemyin

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Skarmory in topic Afghanistan deaths

Todo

edit

I just copied and pasted the storm section over to a new article. There was sufficient information in the article, and such a deadly storm deserves an article. Some updated information would be needed. Hurricanehink (talk) 02:58, 15 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Don't quite see how this is high-impt, so lowered to mid. Chacor 04:47, 15 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Potentially over 1000 deaths is worthy of high impt, to me. Hurricanehink (talk) 12:32, 15 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Note to put into article

edit

please read this link and consider mentioning information provided in the article-

http://www.weatherunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/comment.html?entrynum=702&tstamp=200706&theprefset=BLOGCOMMENTS&theprefvalue=0 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.177.62.10 (talk) 23:47, 30 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Naming

edit

The IMD has retroactively named the system Yemyin, so I moved the article to Cyclone Yemyin and updated some references, the lede, and the naming section. However, dealing with storm history might be a little tricky because we don't have best track information on the system. --Coredesat 06:53, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Can we not use the Operational Advisories to Create the Rough Track as there seems to be enough Data there to plot the track ??? Jason Rees 20:28, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

We would use JTWC best track for that as IMD does not have best track data available. We would need the IMD best track for timing purposes (when'd it become a cyclonic storm, for instance). --Coredesat 22:55, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Picture

edit
 

I am keeping this photo here..HunterZone (talk) 13:13, 19 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 23 external links on Cyclone Yemyin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:59, 4 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Afghanistan deaths

edit

There are numbers of 113 and "over 80" listed in the article, and I can't find a source for either. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 09:37, 1 December 2020 (UTC)Reply