Talk:Ctenomorpha marginipennis
Latest comment: 3 years ago by No such user in topic Requested move 17 July 2021
A fact from Ctenomorpha marginipennis appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 August 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 17 July 2021
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved to Ctenomorpha marginipennis. While I'm reasonably familiar with Wikidata I don't know how to prevent automatic moving of the item, sorry. No such user (talk) 08:47, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Ctenomorphodes chronus → Ctenomorpha marginipennis – synonym see http://phasmida.speciesfile.org/Common/basic/Taxa.aspx?TaxonNameID=1201347 (Wikidata should also be moved). Roy Bateman (talk) 07:28, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- Support; as far as I'm aware, Phasmid Speciesfile is the best taxonomci database for phasmids, so we should follow that. There isn't a Wikidata item for Ctenomorpha marginipennis at the moment; one should be created, and interwiki links moved to the new item, but the Wikidata item for Ctenomorphodes chronus shouldn't be moved or merged (Wikidata retains separate items for taxonomic synonyms). Plantdrew (talk) 17:33, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.