Talk:Continuant
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 August 2020 and 23 November 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lbc21.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:28, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
nasals
editThe page incorrectly said that nasals weren't continuants. whether nasals and oral non-stops pattern together is controversial (see, e.g., the paper on continuants by Jeff Mielke), but the traditional definition is quite clear that nasals are continuants (see Anderson's 1970s paper on this). I'll add citations later.
rhotics
editThis page incorrectly says that rhotics are not continuants. Rhotics do not generate a complete obstruction of airflow through the oral cavity. Nasals, however are not continuants. See Hayes 2009. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Btheb (talk • contribs) 30 April 2013
Sounds
editThis page sounds "sounds". i think a better way to phrase it would be Phoneme
71.201.54.132 (talk) 02:16, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- No, the word continuant describes a type of sound, not a type of phoneme. The terms "sound" and "phoneme" are not synonymous. Mr. Granger (talk) 02:31, 9 December 2013 (UTC)