Talk:Conservative replacement
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Evolution and evolvability in topic Mutation vs Replacement
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Mutation vs Replacement
edit@Manudouz: Although I'm sympathetic to your renaming, "conservative replacement" and "conservative mutation" have similar numbers of hits on a google scholar search, and are used pretty interchangeably in the literature. For now I've left the page as moved, and added the alternative term in the lead sentence. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 10:33, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Evolution and evolvability: Dear Thomas: thank you for your remark. I also added substitution in the lead sentence. Actually, things would be more accurate if the terms replacement / mutation / substitution were used together with either nucleotides or amino acids. -- Manudouz (talk) 20:54, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Manudouz: You're quite right. We had similar issues over Protein expression versus gene expression and protein production. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 22:31, 11 March 2018 (UTC)