Talk:Confectionery in the English Renaissance
Latest comment: 3 years ago by SL93 in topic Did you know nomination
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Confectionery in the English Renaissance appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 January 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 02:59, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that confectionery in the English Renaissance marks the transition of sugar from a medicine to a sweetener? Source: [1]
- Comment: This is my second DYK nomination, so I believe I am still exempt from the review requirement (and frankly, I don't feel confident enough just yet to do that). There's probably a lot more possible hooks here, if needed I can think of some more.
Moved to mainspace by Dariazh (talk). Nominated by LordPeterII (talk) at 23:09, 6 January 2021 (UTC).
- New & long enough, hook checks out, well-written & referenced. Earwig only finds ingredients. But given the subject, this should use British English, & the various "flavor", "mold" etc should be changed. Johnbod (talk) 18:15, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Good point. @Johnbod I have tried to change spelling as good as I could according to the MOS and added a template for British spelling. However, I'm not a native speaker and not quite sure what all the differences are. Could you check if I missed something? --LordPeterII (talk) 09:59, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Done, plus added some links. Johnbod (talk) 19:07, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you, that was helpful. Does it mean you'll accept the submission now @Johnbod? --LordPeterII (talk) 10:20, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- Done, plus added some links. Johnbod (talk) 19:07, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Good point. @Johnbod I have tried to change spelling as good as I could according to the MOS and added a template for British spelling. However, I'm not a native speaker and not quite sure what all the differences are. Could you check if I missed something? --LordPeterII (talk) 09:59, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- GTG. No qpq needed. Johnbod (talk) 14:45, 14 January 2021 (UTC)