Talk:Computer animation
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Jonas1015119 in topic Splitting 3D and 2D into two different categories
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Computer animation article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
To-do list for Computer animation:
Priority * -- 22:03, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
|
This article was the subject of an educational assignment in February 2013. Further details are available here. |
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Splitting 3D and 2D into two different categories
editHello,
Over the next few weeks I plan to separate the topics of 3D and 2D animation into two separate categories as is noted on this article's "To-do list." I will be sure to preserve the content and particularly focus on making the article more readable and organized by allowing each sub topic to have its own section. Feel free to leave any suggestions here or questions about what I will do here. ZacZig (talk) 18:07, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- I definitely support. —theMainLogan (t•c) 01:40, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- is this still happening? Some related articles that also need some work are virtual cinematography, and the Traditional animation article, which is terribly named and mixes digital 2D animation and hand-drawn cel animation. — jonas (talk) 05:10, 4 November 2024 (UTC)