Talk:Commandant General Royal Marines

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Dormskirk in topic New Commandant June 2019

History

edit

Marked no on class B criterion 2. The history should be more important with the double duty status currently appearing above the section. The history needs more detail. Created in 1943, it seems like there should be more out there on this topic. Obviously it had something to do with WWII. Who pushed it through? What was the reason? How did it structurally differ from the previous arrangement? Timothyjosephwood (talk) 17:26, 19 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Commandant General Royal Marines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:23, 27 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Commandant General Royal Marines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:09, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

This may be of interest

edit

http://www.janes.com/article/79465/uk-amphibious-headquarters-to-disappear-in-merger

Sammartinlai (talk) 10:13, 20 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

New Commandant June 2019

edit

http://www.gulabin.com/armynavy/pdf/Admirals-Current.pdf

"Major-General Matthew J. Holmes" but don't add yet until Royal Navy releases news.

BlueD954 (talk) 14:26, 2 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Done. See Matthew Holmes (Royal Marines officer). Thanks, Dormskirk (talk) 15:33, 2 June 2019 (UTC)Reply