Talk:Columbia, Maine

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Maine Low‑importance

	Maine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaineWikipedia:WikiProject MaineTemplate:WikiProject MaineMaine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Maine may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Source(s) of information in this article?

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I've noticed that this article contains several uncited and unencyclopedic (by WP standards) passages. I'm wondering if they were lifted word-for-word from an Annual Town Report or something similar. If so, that would be potential violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. Although it's excellent information (and appears to be well-written, if not professionally written), it would have to be removed or extensively reworked into original prose and properly cited. Ripogenus77 (talk) 03:13, 16 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I agree. The very fact that the bulk of the article is preceded with a disclaimer saying the info was garnered from many locations, yet none of the following text is cited at all, leads me to believe the entire bulk of it needs to be deleted. If others want to return the information, properly cited, then great; otherwise, it qualifies as original research under Wikipedia's standards, and as you pointed out, may be a pile of potential copyright violations. Since nothing is cited, we have no way of knowing. Indy (talk) 19:59, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Columbia, Maine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:26, 28 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic