This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I am not sure this is the best title for the page. The name of the service changed, and the question then arises of whether there should be a separate page for HM Overseas Civil Service, as its functions are non-colonial, although not to begin with. If putting two names into one title is the answer, which perhaps it is for now, I do not think it makes sense to include "HM" in one name and not in the other. It's far from clear what the solution is, so I am inviting comments here. If there are no comments, I may change the name again. Moonraker (talk) 22:01, 28 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
No it isn't. I've moved it back. I don't know if we need two separate articles, but it's overwhelmingly best-known as the Colonial Service. Redirects from the other titles are perfectly sufficient. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:07, 29 March 2019 (UTC)Reply