Talk:Collotype

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject History of photography.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts

[Untitled]

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The last paragraph is simply incorrect. It describes not collotype, but collagraph. (http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Collagraphy). I have deleted it. Ian (talk) 19:54, 17 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Collotype. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130213104006/http://brevetsphotographiques.fr/englishluisnadeau.htm to http://brevetsphotographiques.fr/englishluisnadeau.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:14, 10 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Changes

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I added a Historical Background to the page. I added what I saw was not present in the article at the time of adding to the article. TKilta (talk) 18:00, 9 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Possible incorrect fact?

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In the Historical Background section it's mentioned that "Collotype" was invented in 1855, yet the MoMa alleges that it has a sample of collotype from 1851.

^[1]

I reached out to MoMA to see what their theories were regarding this item, but due to the pandemic, they're unable to examine the object in person. I'll follow up with them again in the future and will post any relevant information. Thellomerca (talk) 23:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

References

^ https://www.moma.org/collection/works/54162

Add topic

[1] ttps://www.moma.org/collection/works/54162

[1]